Crazy, Stupid, Love is just so gosh-darn lovable that it's flaws have brought me into a state of confusion. Do I love it because it was "crazy" and a little "stupid" or did I find some of it to not work? What I can tell you is that it has a heart to it. It's sweet and funny and will put you in a great mood. What else could you really ask for from a romantic comedy now days, right?
Steve Carrell (The Office) plays Cal: A man who in the first scene of the film has his heart broken by his wife, Emily (played by Julianne Moore), as she asks for a divorce at dinner in a restaurant. This causes him to repeatedly go out to a cocktail lounge to drink away some misery, until Jacob notices him. Ryan Goslings' "Jacob" takes it upon himself to give Cal a confidence boost by going with him on a shopping spree montage of fine clothing and giving him a few helpful tips and one-liners to pick up women. It works. Not only for the character Cal, who gains confidence and even meets a lovely, energetic nutcase (Kate, played by Marisa Tomei), but it works for us as the audience. Cal is so funnily heartbroken and Gosling's performance as Jacob strikes just the right chord between effortlessly cool and spot-on sharp, that their likability just enhances the chemistry.
The only problems are that there are so many sideplots that it actually hinders the story in a few places. With Cal's son falling for the family babysitter, to Emma Stone's "Hannah" finding herself into Jacob's life, to Emily's affair with David Lindhagen, played by Kevin Bacon, there is a nice balance to it all but it's only inevitable that something would get shortchanged. I found it to be Emily's backstory. Why did she find herself sleeping with David Lindhagen in the first place? What was going wrong in her marriage with Cal? She never really tells us fully. We never know. We are supposed to side with both characters in the divorce because they are sympathetic and we want them to reconnect. We're supposed to get into the present and forget that past but that's bothersome because that's the catalyst for the entire plot!
One other problem bothered me about this film that stops it from being perfect.....
(MINOR SPOILER ALERT)
There is a climax in the plot at the son's graduation scene where speeches are made and character's get their revelations, so on and so forth. The film almost feels very realistic, for a romantic comedy in it's formula anyway. This scene breaks that off and goes into such unrealistic territory that it's annoying. Why did this script need this scene? Why couldn't the setting have changed?
(END SPOILERS)
I will say this. The script does have plenty of twists and surprises to keep you thoroughly engaged. It's rare to have things come up where, in this day and age, you do not see them coming, but writer Dan Fogelman at least was able to have it happen. My full fledged praise for this film goes out to the cast, particularly Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone. Ryan Gosling is truly one of the most talented young actors working today. He has had his serious and intense roles but he owns this role, giving us something new and enjoyable to watch once again. If Jacob was too much of his "character", he could have been tiring and we could have thought he is purely all outer persona and not anything within. With Gosling working, we keep wanting more Jacob. He steals every scene until Stone shares it with him. Her personality is too attractive to not enjoy. She has a presence and talent there. You can see it fully-fledged in Easy A but here,when you are the most memorable person in a film full of this cast, you have to give credit to her.
Crazy, Stupid, Love is a good film and an enjoyable film that could have been perfect. That is the only reason as a review it may seem a tad harsh. But with every character being fun to watch and a story told well enough to have you smiling, if you were looking to see the film, it just may be the ticket you will want to buy.
Bayley: 3/4 Stars.
Monday, August 8, 2011
Friday, August 5, 2011
Alan Rickman is leading the Supporting Actor Oscar race! -Bayley
Harry Potter is a cultural phenomena. I don't need to say what hasn't already been said. At this time, on August 5th, the "final" film of the franchise Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 has grossed $1, 018, 425, 686 worldwide and is also the #8 highest grossing film of all-time (imdb.com). The crazy thing is by next week all these statistics will be obsolete as it racks in more money. I have seen the film twice and feel that it is a worthy edition and finale in the most successful film franchise of all-time and is quite possibly the best of all eight films. But the surprise chatter about this film is actor Alan Rickman's, Severus Snape, character. With famous critics such as Ebert and Roeper giving Oscar-worthy predictions and praise to him, it's something to think about. Critics and fans start the catalyst of buzz and while it is hard to maintain this buzz all the way til Oscar season (starting roughly at the beginning of October), one could say this is sure to withstand the months. But why?
Well, Rickman is a screen veteran. Having starred in films and television since 1971, I will always remember him as Hans Gruber from Die Hard ("Now I have a machine gun....ho ho ho"......what a guy!). He is definitely most famous for this role of Severus Snape, whose mystery and complexity have given readers enough for some to call him their favorite character. In the films, his story arc is slow to gain its complete stride. In Sorcerer's Stone he is introduced as a possible villain and is in the spotlight but for films 2-4, he is merely doing his "Snape" thing, so to speak. This is in no way a bad thing. Rickman has fun with the role, even giving a certain "broken down" sentence verbalization of the lines that has now become synonymous with the role. In 5-8, he gets much more to do. From helping Harry to keep Voldemort from penetrating his mind, to the final moments on screen, we get the character we thought was a villain, become just a pissed off teacher, to a villain, to a misunderstood hero. Woah.
"I wish I had another change of clothes in these films..."
But the point I truly wanted to make was about this final film and final performance. Here, the character of Snape is revealed for who he is. All the readers wanted to see how this character would be portrayed in his pivotal moments. I must say, it did not disappoint anyone I think I have spoken to at all. The scene in particular that many point out as THE scene from the film, is the montage of Snape's memories. It's the emotional pull of the film (besides the ties your Harry Potter-reading heart's had when you realized your childhood was ending before your eyes). Rickman is only in a few scenes of the film but he was able to play everything perfectly and not break his moody character but rather add a heart to it that we always knew was there and were waiting to see revealed.
Can Rickman get nominated for Best Supporting Actor come Oscar time? Yes. Why? Three main reasons come to mind...
1. The Academy wants to acknowledge the Harry Potter Series- The films may have been tucked away as 'just blockbusters' or "children's films", but this one hit a dramatic level that critics and audiences are fully embracing.
2. Rickman has never been nominated for an Oscar before- The Academy loves to acknowledge under-appreciated actors with long careers, especially with a character that solidifies their career. Here you go...
3. If Judi Dench can win Best Supporting Actress for Shakespeare In Love in 1998 for being on-screen for eight minutes, why not Rickman?- Right?
Leave your feedback on this year's Oscar contender's so far and if you are on board with me about Alan Rickman. And please, if you haven't seen Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 yet (and you're reading this?), then please go see it and rent all the films previous to it because they truly will be remembered films.
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Bayley and Napoli "At the Movies"!
-Hello Everyone!
We have been planning to do this for some time and the blog is finally here! Daniel Bayley and Michael Napoli are two students studying film at St. Johns University and Desales University, respectively. Daniel has written film reviews for TheCinemaSource.com and the two have compiled lists for the Best Films in Hollywood for the past six years. We have been inspired by film critics, such as Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, since we were children and have always wanted to collaborate online about our thoughts on films. Look out for our film reviews, lists of favorites of 2011, and podcasts with some of our friends! We look forward to your feedback and your thoughts on films...because that's what it's all about! Filmmakers share art and we want to talk passionately with all those who enjoy it as much as we do. We look forward to the future because where we're going....we don't need roads.
-Bayley and Napoli At the Movie Theater
We have been planning to do this for some time and the blog is finally here! Daniel Bayley and Michael Napoli are two students studying film at St. Johns University and Desales University, respectively. Daniel has written film reviews for TheCinemaSource.com and the two have compiled lists for the Best Films in Hollywood for the past six years. We have been inspired by film critics, such as Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, since we were children and have always wanted to collaborate online about our thoughts on films. Look out for our film reviews, lists of favorites of 2011, and podcasts with some of our friends! We look forward to your feedback and your thoughts on films...because that's what it's all about! Filmmakers share art and we want to talk passionately with all those who enjoy it as much as we do. We look forward to the future because where we're going....we don't need roads.
-Bayley and Napoli At the Movie Theater
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)